Skip to content

11 thoughts on “Raw data: How much it costs to employ you

  1. cmayo

    This isn't really useful information without being broken down by tenure or level of employee.

    It also looks like executive positions must be grouped with "Managers", making that category overly broad and therefore basically useless.

    TBH, a better point of data is simply knowing what is the fringe rate - which varies by location and industry.

  2. mooreej

    Strictly speaking, this is how much your employer compensates you. How much it costs to employ you is a completely different kettle of fish and consists of real estate and support and a thousand other little charges that anyone who has budget authority (like Kevin in a past life) needs to worry about.

    This, of course, is at front of mind in 2023

  3. different_name

    Interesting as a very high-level number, but the variance is huge.

    I'm in an outlier industry (fintech), but the entry-level kids just out of school I hire cost more than 2x the 'manager' figure.

    1. different_name

      If you want to be managed by a paperclip-maximizer, you already have the option of working in Amazon warehouses.

      Let me know how you like it.

  4. tango

    Whoa, Teachers!?! We always hear about how underpaid teachers are, but if this is true, it looks like that really is not the case at all. Like the military, they may see less of their compensation in the form of direct wages and more in benefits, but wow, they are not cheap...

  5. ghosty

    Being persnickety, but for profitable businesses it doesn’t cost anything to employ. A function of an employee’s labor is it generates more revenue for the employer than it costs.

  6. MattBallAZ

    My wife (formerly a full professor at Carnegie Mellon University) works with special needs kids at the best high school here in Tucson, AZ. She makes $150/day gross. Zero benefits.

Comments are closed.