This is a row of aspen trees at Aspendell, about ten miles southwest of Bishop. It is four images stitched together in Photoshop.
Too dense for display at this size? Maybe. Perhaps three images would have been better:
Alternatively, maybe this is just flatly too dense and detailed for display at this size no matter how I crop it. I'm not sure, but there's no question that it lost too much resolution when I reduced it to 2000 pixels wide. It's just not sharp enough now.
It'd be kind of spendy, but it would make a beautiful large scale print. Make that sucker about six feet long and get lost in the detail. I agree that on my 21" monitor it doesn't look great, but I'll bet if you put it on a giant 4K screen it would be spectacular.
Nice. Going for the Ansel Adams series.
I may have to re-think my post to Kevin
He does have links to Balloon Juice and Monkey Cage - either of which could be synonymous with Trump !!!!!
Kevin-
This is very OFF TOPIC but........
I noted that you have no links posted yet to former President Trump's blog.
It's not the bestest I'm sure, and I doubt you would read it yourself - but you know.........
the irony is," /work". i mean, it's not like he does any work.
Whooee! A person could get rid of a lot of money fast if they were to click on that "Save America" image.
Aspen tree.
I'll bet a dollar to a doughnut that is a single, clonal organism with a shared root system.
But I dunno. Details may be lost, but I think the mass impression has its own interest.
Lack of anything in the foreground makes it hard to focus on so much background. Still, the density of it is why it's interesting.