Skip to content

9 thoughts on “Raw data: The price of oil

    1. jte21

      Yup. And speaking of seasonal cycles, it's that time of year again when the daffodils start blooming, the robins are chirping, and California refinery managers decide when to schedule that annual "equipment accident" just in time for the summer reformulation switch that sends gasoline prices spiking 30%.

      1. different_name

        The annual Richmond breakdown, you can almost set your watch by it.

        Speaking of which, the price trend would seem to indicate it is time for an analogous UAE spike. Paying off Kushner is expensive!

  1. NeilWilson

    This is a stupid post.
    You shouldn't think of the price of something in inflation adjusted terms when saying it is the same as it was at some point in the past.

    What you actually said was that the price of oil INCREASED about the same rate as everything else INCREASED.

    Is that what you meant to say?

    If we had a lot of inflation then the price of oil is A LOT higher. If we had little inflation then the price of oil is just A LITTLE higher.

    Not everything needs to be adjusted for inflation every time.

    We don't define a bull market as the S&P being up 20% MORE than inflation since its previous low.

    You don't talk about budget deficits in inflation adjusted terms. You can compare them to GDP. But that GDP is NOT adjusted for inflation. The rate of growth is adjusted for inflation but NOT the raw figure.

    1. skeptonomist

      You know what your income is, so adjust to that. That would be most meaningful for most people, and adjusting to median (not average) income would be useful overall.

  2. rick_jones

    Speaking of inflation adjustment, which measure? Core, which is if you will transitively affected by energy prices, or headline, which includes it directly?

    1. Lounsbury

      In addition, from a proper economist point of view, while deflating prices can be useful, one should so as not to be intentionally or unintentionally distortive or deceptive
      (1) indicate against what baseline (e.g. 1980, 1990, whatever)
      (2) what deflator is used

      One rather fears otherwise poor statistical practice.

      Given the "trendlines" practice...

      (there are quite legitimate tradeoffs and no single practice but one should make the baseline and deflating transparent on the econometric choices)

Comments are closed.