The Wall Street Journal is inexplicable. Take a look at this headline/chart combo from today's paper:
The chart is clear as day: Boomers in the Reagan era were stuck well into "unaffordable" territory for more than six years. Millennials, by contrast, spent 15 years with wonderful, super-affordable housing and since then have been barely in unaffordable territory for one year.
So where does the headline come from? The story is an endless hodgepodge of unrelated data, but its main point seems to be that back in the '80s interest rates were high but housing supply was fine. Today housing supply is tight so we're all doomed.
Which might be true, I suppose, if housing supply stays tight forever. Which it won't. New home building (and sales) are at a fairly normal rate right now, about the same as in 2019. The problem is that existing homes aren't being put on the market at the usual rate. But there's no reason to think this will last forever, and when it turns around housing supply will ease. Then, when the Fed finally lowers interest rates, mortgages will return to normal levels.
But I guess that's not a very interesting story.
NOTE: I should add that the Journal's data is actually more optimistic than I expected. I thought housing affordability really was in the dumpster at the moment, but it's not. It is in weak shape by historical standards, but it's only barely below the 100% mark. That's not as bad as I thought.