Skip to content

Raw data: Police officers killed in the US

Data for both "felonious killings" and the total number of sworn police officers comes from the FBI. It does not include deaths from illness or accidental deaths.

34 thoughts on “Raw data: Police officers killed in the US

  1. Steve Stein

    I don't like the trend line. Looks like it's increasing from 2013-present.
    Maybe you need 2, splitting the data pre- and post- 2013?

      1. Coby Beck

        Not sure if this is intentional condoning of murdering police given the "we" you use, but if so it is rather aborhent. I am sickened by the culture of impunity that exist for police brutality, but I do not rejoice for any extra-judicial murder of officers.

        1. pipecock

          If you’re not part of the solution you’re part of the problem.

          You’re part of the problem, then.

  2. GrumpyPDXDad

    Yes, but does it really mean that police officers are less likely to be killed?

    I know somewhere in here is the lead-crime hypothesis, but I can imagine many other factors. One alternate explanation: the population/police ratio has not kept up with population growth, and thus the police simply have fewer "opportunities" to be shot at. Or is it a change in police tactics? (The Feds seem to have taken this to heart, see the Bundy clan) One hypothesis we don't have to entertain is "fewer guns".

    Regardless, its pretty much an edge case ... although as with all low-probability, high consequence events we lose our ability to deal with them rationally.

    Has the NRA issued a "thoughts and prayers" statement to the four families yet?

  3. golack

    Do the numbers include off duty officers? Chicago has had two killed in front of their homes after finishing their shifts in the past year.

    1. lawnorder

      I also seem to recall reading that the largest single cause of death among on-duty cops is car accidents.

  4. alkali19

    It feels like given the overall drop in crime from the early 1990s that this line should have dropped more than it has. It would be interesting to see homicides per 100,000 plotted over the top of it.

  5. Austin

    Good lord counting angels on the head of a pin. The number has been 10 or lower for a quarter century, including 2001 when a bunch died sadly in full view of CNN cameras in Lower Manhattan. Who cares if it’s going slightly up or down? It looks pretty stable, and it’s down like 40% from the early 1990s, and probably (although Kevin doesn’t show us) down since before then too, when cities really were “scary hellholes” that everyone who could fled. Isn’t that good enough?

  6. Justin

    I don't like rates of death for statistics like this. How many police were killed is the only decent metric. The number of police on duty in a given year seems to vary between 600,000 and 800,000 or so.

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/1126829/number-law-enforcement-officers-killed-us/

    Put more police on the street and the rate goes down but the actual number of killings can go up! And that's the only thing that really matters. Killing police is bad period.

    Shot but not killed by criminals is bad too.

      1. Justin

        And this is why some people, including me, think democrats deserve to get raked over the coals regarding crime.

        Chicago:

        "The fact is ShotSpotter is giving us an advantage when we don't have enough boots on the ground," said 11th Ward Alderwoman Nicole Lee.

        "Some alderpeople in high-crime wards say many residents gave up calling 911 when they hear gunshots a long time ago. They say ShotSpotter takes the place of that, but the mayor says focusing on the root causes of crime is the key to solving it."

        No such thing as a "high crime ward". Crime is low!

        1. Joel

          "And this is why some people, including me, think democrats deserve to get raked over the coals regarding crime."

          LOL! Because Chicago=democrats in your universe?

        2. golack

          Shot spotter picked up the shots that killed the police officer in front of her home in 2023...and no one responded. The police finally responded to her Apple Watch alert--31 minutes later. In the latest shooting, they started their response because of shot spotter, though it still sounds like it took a while for them to show up.

  7. gibba-mang

    I remember reading something a year or two ago that more cops died of COVID than were murdered on duty

    1. iamr4man

      In 2021 more cops died of Covid than all other causes put together. Police officers had access to the vaccine first but were amongst the group least likely to get vaccinated. I’ll bet they all had bulletproof vests though. Go figure.

  8. cephalopod

    It would be interesting to see what the trend is for officers being shot (and not just killed).

    Trauma surgery has greatly improved since the '80s. Similarly, it would be interesting to see if the recent uptick is about more shootings of officers, or higher likelihood of death if shot (a possibility given the rise in the popularity of guns like AR-15s).

    10 deaths per 100,000 officers seems pretty high. I can't imagine any other developed nations are even close to that.

    1. Joel

      "10 deaths per 100,000 officers seems pretty high. I can't imagine any other developed nations are even close to that.

      No developed nation has anywhere near the per capita private gun ownership as the US. More guns=more gun-related deaths.

  9. bbleh

    It might be parsing too finely, but I'd be interested to see per capita figures red-state vs. blue-state. I know gun deaths per capita are higher in red states, and I wouldn't be surprised if police deaths are likewise.

    Of course all this contradicts the Received Wisdom that blue states are crime-ridden hellholes that don't Respect The Blue, so it's just ee-leetist "statistics" that can prove anything, doncha know. Also, Mr. Trump will outlaw any stuff like this, so then we won't have to worry about it.

    1. pipecock

      I like blue states because they don’t respect the police as much. If only they totally disrespected them maybe we could get somewhere as a society.

    1. pipecock

      You’d only think that if you believe police ever argue anything in good faith.

      Alas they do not.

Comments are closed.