Skip to content

Trump indicted in Georgia

We don't yet know the details, but apparently the shoe has finally dropped in the Georgia "find 11,780 votes" case. A grand jury has returned ten indictments against Donald Trump, but we won't know exactly what the charges are for another hour or two.

In any case, Trump has now been impeached twice for high crimes and misdemeanors, indicted four times on felony conspiracy and obstruction charges, and forced to pay tens of millions of dollars in civil actions for fraud and sexual assault. That's quite a record.

TWO HOURS LATER: We have details. The grand jury indicted 19 people on 41 separate counts, including RICO conspiracy charges for some of them. Among the indicted are:

  • Donald Trump, disgraced former US president
  • Rudy Giuliani, demented former "America's Mayor"
  • John Eastman, crackpot lawyer
  • Mark Meadows, panicky former White House chief of staff
  • Sidney Powell, another crackpot lawyer
  • Kenneth Chesebro, unscrupulopus lawyer who conceived the whole fake electors scheme

Plus there are 13 others charged on various counts of mopery and dopery.

59 thoughts on “Trump indicted in Georgia

  1. pjcamp1905

    Ten, not necessarily all of Trump. Giuliani is a target as are several fake electors. There are probably others. You're likely to see more than just Trump.

    1. Mitch Guthman

      It may be that Trump won’t be charged in this batch of indictments. It could be that prosecutors are teeing up potential cooperators and basically clearing away some issues that might make it easier to get at Trump later. It could be that Rudi and the Kracken lady are wobbly and also some or all of the fake electors or the people that breached the election computers—if so, the DA. might be looking to scoop them up to strengthen the case against Trump. Not likely but a possibility.

    2. ArmaniOlivia

      I have my first check for $13,000. I have a lot of energy so I always have something first. s12 Now I’m going to work a lot harder and barely finish next week’s episode. q I strongly encourage everyone to sign up. .
      periods,……………………. http://bizpay68.blogspot.com

  2. jonziegler

    While it’s likely to include Trump, all we know at this point is that the grand jury signed off on ten indictments.

    Could be anybody. But I’m betting on at least Trump, Giuliani, and The Kraken (Sidney Powell).

      1. Anandakos

        Those ones you haven't heard of are would-be fake electors, the ones who didn't turn State's evidence. Hey guys (and gals) of the "Georgia Electors" scam, the bus has left the station; you missed it.

        You clearly think that you did nothing wrong, and that's every American's right. It's also dead wrong; there are documents you signed fraudulently, illegal meetings you attended, and a long string of electronic communications snarling your futures.

  3. kahner

    I didn't realize this till today, but in GA the governor can't issue pardons, it's done by the Board of Pardons and Parole. But more than that, as far as I can tell, they can't issue a pardon until 5 years after the sentence has been completed. It doesn't shorten a prison sentence just restores certain rights post release. So if there's convictions on these charges and they carry prison time, I don't think there's any way for him to avoid doing the time.

    https://pap.georgia.gov/parole-consideration/pardons-restoration-rights

    1. Anandakos

      WOW, this is a REAL hammer to crack Giuliani and Powell. But I hope Ms. Willis just hangs up on Chesebro's and Eastman's lawyers when they call begging for mercy. That little twerp Eastman is going to become some big guy's very compliant punk.

      He can use his sentence to "study" same-sex "marriage". He might find a new enthusiasm for it once he's in one.

      Just to be clear, I did a year in McAlester (Oklahoma), fortunately mostly as a trustee. So I do know a bit about the "romances" and jealous rages "inside".

      Have a good time, John.

    2. KenSchulz

      Oh, if tfg manages to get re-elected, he’ll find a Jeffrey Clark 2.0 who will declare Georgia’s attempt to jail a President an insurrection, and DJT will send the troops in …

    3. Austin

      This definitely will be one of those laws that the GOP changes once it’s clear that prominent Republicans are becoming ensnared in it.

    4. Jasper_in_Boston

      So if there's convictions on these charges and they carry prison time, I don't think there's any way for him to avoid doing the time.

      You do realize Donnie has a private jet and a lot of foreign dictators on his Rolodex, right?

      1. Mitch Guthman

        What I think is being overlooked is that conviction anywhere except in Georgia on RICO charges will not make any difference to Trump’s life or ability to run for president. It seems extremely unlikely that he’s actually going to be imprisoned like an ordinary person which means that he will get some kind of probation.

        But, for Trump, probation (like his terms of release) will be a nullity since the thing that compels obedience to judicial orders is the threat of imprisonment. If he’s not going to be locked up like an ordinary person, Trump’s really got nothing to worry about.

        Which means that he’s not going to take a plea or run away to a foreign country to avoid being sent to prison. And he’s not going to obey the orders from these different judges not to incite violence against the prosecutors or the witnesses.

        1. jte21

          I agree he can run for president all he wants while he's under indictment, on trial, in prison, etc. But what makes you think that if he's convicted, and the sentencing guidelines are pretty clear about prison time, why he won't actually have to be incarcerated in some way? Now, I doubt it would be in a regular federal pen with the general population, but why wouldn't he go to some Club Fed, maybe with a special suite where the SS can still keep an eye on him?

          1. kahner

            yeah, people keep saying "he'll never do time even if he's convicted", and i get why that's a possibility, but it doesn't seem like a certainty to me. people also said he'd never be charged, and here we are with 4 indictments and 90+ felony charges i believe. never say never.

          2. Mitch Guthman

            My reason is the special status of presidents as basically non-heredity monarchs. I don’t think it would be acceptable to the elites in this country (who largely enjoy impunity themselves) to actually put a former president in prison (even in “keep away”).

            The other reason is that Donald Trump’s the head of one of the two major political parties (and, arguably, the dominant one. And this is a political party with essentially an armed wing which includes a significant number of MAGA-killers who are likely to engage in terrorist reprisals until Trump is released. This control over the Republican Party is a source of great power for Trump and it’s the main reason why I say that he feels free to ignore the conditions of his pretrial release and why he won’t go to prison if he is convicted.

            1. cld

              That is exactly why he should be jailed. The precedent he sets demands a countervailing precedent, at whatever the risk or cost.

              And, in fact, I think the risk would fade rapidly, except among a few of the real nutcases, when he is no longer present to egg them on.

              1. Anandakos

                The few nutcases wouldn't be able to control themselves and so will end up at the end of a mini-gun hailstorm from an Apache.

      2. kahner

        well, if this leads to conviction and him fleeing the country, that's not quite as good as prison but i'll take it. however, i'm not so sure any of his dictator buddies really give a shit about him if he doesn't have a chance to be president again, at least not enough to earn the ire of the US by harboring him post conviction. you think putin is any more loyal to his lackeys than trump?

    5. jte21

      There was also some concern on the intertubes earlier this morning that Kemp might be able to pull a De Santis and remove the DA because there will be a new law coming into effect in Georgia later this year that allows elected prosecutors to be impeached or removed under certain circumstances. Fortunately, it appears that 1. the process to do so is actually pretty complicated and not directly controlled by the governor and 2. Kemp issued a statement a short time ago that made it pretty clear he thinks Trump is a guilty piece of shit and has no intention of intervening in the legal process.

      So: no possibility of a federal pardon for Trump someday. No possibility of a state pardon in GA. His only hope is jury nullification, but this will probably be the most carefully vetted jury pool in history, so that's not likely either. He's going to prison.

  4. Srho

    "...impeached twice for high crimes and misdemeanors, indicted four times on felony conspiracy and obstruction charges, and forced to pay tens of millions of dollars in civil actions for fraud and sexual assault."

    Plus the dissolution of his phony university and crooked foundation.

    1. kahner

      and he's the runaway frontrunner for the GOP presidential nomination. trump's criminality and general horribleness is just a reflection of the republican party as a whole.

  5. faledal543

    From felon Spiro Agnew to Richard Nixon to the Iran-Contra scandal under Ronald Reagan, then the production of the Iraq War under G.W. Bush, republicans set the stage for criminality on a whole new level with trump. What would you expect from the ‘law & order’ party.

    1. jte21

      Not to mention that three of the greatest economic catastrophes to ever strike America happened on Republican watches: the Great Depression under Hoover; the Great Recession under Bush; the Covid pandemic under Trump. Plus all the corruption scandals you mention.

      Yet Republicans are still ranked better on the economy and, yes, thought of as the law and order party. The mind reels.

  6. D_Ohrk_E1

    The key appears to be Georgia's RICO and the central crime is attempted election fraud. The other crimes are in furtherance of election fraud and Georgia's RICO allows DA Willis to pull in people who would have otherwise escaped ties to a criminal enterprise at the federal level.

    My reading of this is that, because Georgia's RICO involves minimum prison sentences (no probation), once they're able to prove election fraud, all 19 should also be found guilty of Georgia's RICO and everyone named in the conspiracy, including Trump, cannot escape prison time.

  7. Citizen Lehew

    The idea of Trump, the ultimate mob boss wanna-be, finally getting taken down by RICO charges of all things... *chef kiss*

  8. Anandakos

    Here's something I've been thinking about. WHAT IF, the Biden Administration is indeed persecuting Donald Trump, and the reason they are doing it is to Troll "The Base" into supporting him lock stock and barrel, handing him the nomination.

    The "independents" who didn't vote for Trump in 2020 are particularly horrified by the anti-democratic (small "D") sulfur that burst from the Trump Volcano in the aftermath of the election and his increasing derangement since. Even though they are seriously underwhelmed by Joe Biden and worried about his ability to perform for five and a half more years -- I am too -- they'll hold their noses and vote against Trump.

    I know; I know; it's a seventh-dimensional three-cushion bank shot, but it makes more and more sense by the day.

    1. Austin

      “… worried about his ability to perform for five and a half more years…”

      I do love how the fat orange blob who constantly eats junk food, never exercises and is only 4 years younger than Biden is somehow seen as the one more likely to survive until 2029.

      1. Anandakos

        A seventy-seven year old has a statistical life expectancy of 9.32 years. An eighty-one year old has only 7.25. As I understand it, life expectancy is the age that 50% of people living at a certain age will attain before their personal death.

        So it's not unreasonable to say that the 93% percent probability that a standard deviation confers happens within about half that time.

        So you can say that Trump has roughly a 50% "certainty" of living five more years, while Biden has only 33%. There is a real difference in those numbers.

        And the truth is that Trump never occupied the office of President with diligence and commitment. His day was about five or six hours five days a week; "staff" did the real work. Biden does the job 24/7/365.

        1. Austin

          Sure but the specific 81 year old we're talking about here is getting literally the best possible medical care of any human being on the face of the earth. I would venture a guess that a sitting president has very little in common with the vast majority of 81 year olds that only have 7.25 years of life expectancy left, and so statistics are inappropriate to use for estimating his life expectancy. (After all, most 81 year olds don't have a doctor waiting in the next room 24/7/365 to respond to their every cough, wheeze or sneeze... which are of course the first signs of impending death for people of all age groups.)

        2. Barry Galef

          I think you're using the Social Security Actuarial Tables, right? They have life expectancy of 9.32 years for a 77-year-old and 7.25 for an 81-year-old. But I don't think you're using them correctly. I get a 73.3% probability of a 77-year-old living 5 more years, and a 62.5% probability for an 81-year-old. I got that by dividing the number of 77-year-olds still alive after five years (at 82) by the number alive now-- in this case 39,360 divided by 53,685. (And similarly for the 81-year-old living to 86 -- 26,518/42,420.) That's a difference of less than 11 percentage points, and they're both likely to make it (unlike in your calculations). And I think even my calculations are too conservative -- rich, well-educated people have better-than-average life expectancy at any age, and of course presidents have other health and treatment advantages.

          1. Anandakos

            Thanks. That's a good way to do the math directly rather than with statistical estimates.

            But it doesn't matter, because Faux and, sadly, the "mainstream media" are going to run pictures of Biden stumbling 24/7 from now until next November. Faux will do it willingly, but the mainstreamers will do it because they don't want to lose all those advertising buckos from the Repugnants' deep pocketed backers.

            When they're done the only images of Joe Biden that voters will have is of him falling.

      2. J. Frank Parnell

        Fred Trump, TFG’s dad, lived to be 94, but developed Alzheimer’s in his later years. People are saying Donald already shows symptoms.

    2. glipsnort

      "I know; I know; it's a seventh-dimensional three-cushion bank shot".
      Yeah.
      "but it makes more and more sense by the day."
      No.

      1. Anandakos

        Of course that's true, and obviously the Documents case was delayed a bit after they were found to be missing by the Archives because the Government was actually giving Trump a chance to return the documents with no repercussions. It's on Trump that he did not take the opportunity.

        It can't be denied, though, that the Justice Department DID dilly-dally for the first two years after January 6th and it's not clear why.

        It has proven to be a real opportunity for Biden, though, because a young and "sane" Republican ticket -- not Ronito DeSantolini obviously, but Rick Scott or Glenn Youngkin -- would beat him badly.

        1. KenSchulz

          ‘Dilly-dally’? They’ve been investigating Hunter Biden for five years! Ken Starr spent four years pursuing the Clintons and came up with a blue dress. I’d say two years is breakneck speed for the DOJ.

          1. Anandakos

            From what I understand, there was no investigation above the lackeys in the Capitol Building until the January Sixth Committee essentially shamed them into opening one.

        2. KenSchulz

          Rick Scott is 70. And no “young, sane” (as if!) Republican was ever going to defeat tfg for the nomination — his cult will have no other gods before him.

            1. KenSchulz

              We see the legal system being weaponized against political opponents that is un-American and unacceptable. — Sen. Tim Scott, commenting on TFG’s latest indictment

              ”These charges are unprecedented and it’s a sad day for our country, especially in light of what clearly appears to be a two-tiered justice system where some are selectively prosecuted, and others are not,” Youngkin (R) tweeted Friday

              That’s enough horrible for me …

    3. Citizen Lehew

      "Even though they are seriously underwhelmed by Joe Biden..."

      As Dark Brandon says, malarkey will not go unchecked, Jack!

      Between huge generational investments in infrastructure (including advanced chip manufacturing), the most significant steps to combat global warming in history, a master class in foreign policy that has strengthened NATO and taken Russia and China to the woodshed, and of course the lowest unemployment rate in ages (after a global pandemic), all accomplished against a Republican party full of demonic jackals, can you name a president in modern American history that has had a more effective first couple years in office?

      1. Mitch Guthman

        I agree with you that Biden’s been a very good president. Also, unless there’s a universally accepted Democratic alternative, the 2024 election will almost certainly be a binary choice between Trump and Biden. So it’s either re-elect Trump and lose our democracy or it’s re-elect Biden and hope that he makes another four years or that Kamala’s a good president if he doesn’t.

      2. Anandakos

        Who of your acquaintances who isn't a partisan Democrat even KNOWS about the things you listed? If the American people knew all this wonderful stuff -- and it IS wonderful! -- would Biden have a 40% approval rating? Don't be stupid in your complacency.

  9. mcdruid

    I popped over to Fox News to see what they say.
    Their main article is very informative, straight news. My guess is they don't care because it is so long that their readers won't get through it.
    Their subsidiary articles, of course, are all of conservatives bashing the indictment. Not one quote from a sane person.
    The main link is to Hannity interviewing Gingrich, but almost all the conversation was about Democrats: Obama's "corruption," Hillary's "crimes," and then the usual lies about Hunter Biden.

    1. Salamander

      How cold! How callous! Their man made them so much money during his heyday, and now they've apparently dumped him like a used condom.

      (heh, heh)

  10. seymourbeardsmore

    Given that ~35-40% of the country seems like it will back Trump no matter what and seems to believe (or at least pretends to) that he can do no wrong and is being politically persecuted, I have absolutely no expectation of him being convicted of any of these crimes.

    1. skeptonomist

      The cases will be decided by juries, not the national population. In DC only 5.6% voted for Trump, so there is about an even chance that a jury randomly selected from voters will not have a Trump voter. In Fulton County GA 26.2% voted for Trump so mostly likely there will be three Trump voters on the jury. In Florida the jury could contain a majority of Trump voters (depending on country).

      1. jte21

        Just being a Trump voter is also no guarantee that they'll vote to acquit no matter what. Recall that one of the jurors on the E. Jean Carrol case later admitted to being a conservative Trump supporter -- and he voted guilty (or "liable" or whatever).

        I think the prosecutors and the judge will be pretty careful to weed out any seriously crazy MAGAts who want on the jury just to they can sabotage the whole thing.

      2. Citizen Lehew

        I just don't know how they'll be able to find a "jury of his peers" for any of these indictments. There can't be that many Demon Lords of Corruption walking around, and by definition they're probably really good at getting out of jury duty.

    1. zaphod

      Yes, this case is in many ways the complement to the DC case. That one is minimalist, focused on Trump, designed for speed, and following the letter of judicial propriety.

      This one highlights the conspiracy and conspirators, and seems to be designed for public exposure and the resulting public discussion. Ergo, being televised is necessary.

  11. CaliforniaDreaming

    Read the indictment. It's long, but there's a lot there.

    I'm no lawyer, but I can see why this took so long to put together, it's literally the basis for a book on what Trump and his Merry Band did following the election loss, and even before.

    I think the best part of it is it includes Trump but maybe it's also a call to not be stupid just because the president calls you to be stupid. The other thing I got from it, don't lie in Georgia, the Bulldogs don't like lying.

  12. KJK

    He has always been a pathological lying piece of shit. Except now instead of defrauding contractors, investors, banks, suppliers, those poor folks who signed up for his bull shit university, he defrauded the Federal Government and a whole bunch of states. Instead of civil lawsuits that he had the money to overwhelm, counter sue the plaintiffs, and force a crappy settlement, he has multiple criminal charges brought by entities that have almost unlimited resources to go after him.

Comments are closed.