Skip to content

15 thoughts on “Friday Cat Blogging – 12 May 2023

    1. Eve

      Google paid 99 dollars an hour on the internet. Everything I did was basic Οnline w0rk from comfort at hΟme for 5-7 hours per day that I g0t from this office I f0und over the web and they paid me 100 dollars each hour. For more details visit
      this article... https://createmaxwealth.blogspot.com

  1. D_Ohrk_E1

    Work from home isn't going anywhere, soon. When you read the article, click on the link to the research from Nicholas Bloom. I think it's fair to say that if you're going to force workers to 100% in-person work, your company is going to falter. Sometimes local and state governments move too slow to adapt; hopefully this isn't the case with rejiggering of zoning codes and building codes.

  2. zic

    You never can tell what those pesky humans might get up to. They might have food, they might take your photo, or perhaps their intent is to scoop a kitty up without consent. You never can tell.

  3. bebopman

    The Big H is auditioning for a movie-franchise sequel to The Pink Panther. Call it The Black Panther. ….. waaaaaa? Wadaya mean we can’t use that?

  4. D_Ohrk_E1

    This RS article regarding Senator Feinstein is a bit worrying for me.

    A familiar pattern would emerge: Feinstein would make an unexpected stance on a bill or policy position, only for her staff to quickly follow up by email to correct the record. It got to the point where reporters would pause before rushing to publish an otherwise-newsworthy declaration because of the inevitability of staff reversing her statement.

    Having witnessed cognitive decline (Dementia) up close, there comes a time when you're not just managing, but you're making decisions for that person. They will struggle with important decisions, and will have forgotten it not five minutes later.

    I think a handful of senators are at different stages of cognitive decline -- either Dementia or Alzheimer's -- and what worries me is that their staffers are the ones making the decisions for these elected officials. I think that has constitutional implications. At what point is someone incapacitated, preventing them from serving the public -- is it when that person can no longer make cogent choices? What should we do?

Comments are closed.