Skip to content

The COVID-19 Vaccine Is Insanely Safe

You really can't say this enough. Tell your friends!

11 thoughts on “The COVID-19 Vaccine Is Insanely Safe

  1. kenalovell

    Well of course; the massive death toll isn't programmed to begin until all potential resistance to the New World Order has been injected with the bioweapon.

    1. cld

      I, for one, am looking forward to the nanobots turning me into a weapon that will threaten the Justice League.

      1. iamr4man

        It looks like you are making a joke. Would you like help?

        Get help writing a joke []
        Just type the joke without help []

        Don’t show this tip again []

        (Damn, I’m starting to look like clippy too)

        1. cld

          I don't need help with jokes, they need help with me.

          I can kill them dead without even knowing what hit me. Inspiration.

          Tim8ng. Gonfidence.

  2. D_Ohrk_E1

    Correction: The mRNA vaccines are insanely safe; the adenovirus-based ones are very safe, but not nearly as safe and effective as the mRNA ones. There are a handful of possible explanations on the mechanism that adenovirus-based vaccines are causing HIT-like clots. Apparently, this one -- https://bityl.co/7Dcg -- has gotten the attention of the folks at J&J/Janssen.

  3. Vog46

    Ah well - speaking as a NON virologist let me say this
    We researched, hypothesized, developed and manufactured a lot of vaccines quickly. Kudos to our scientific community and biomed industry

    So when COVID is done or situated in a once per year shot
    Can we PLEASE get back to large sample pools, extensive testing and finding out ALL the bad stuff about future meds before they get rolled out? Please?
    The pharma industry would just LOVE to limit testing and get protections against widespread liability problems associated with future medicine development for sure !!!
    One successful outbreak control does NOT make me all that confident

    1. Clyde Schechter

      @Vog46

      Well, pharma is always looking for weighs to escape from regulation. But I think everyone is aware that this situation was sui generis. The high population mortality and rapid spread of the disease created unique circumstances that made the immediate benefits of a highly effective vaccine clearly outweigh the risk of longer term adverse effects that might be discovered later. I don't think anybody in a policy position regards the rapid emergency authorization of these vaccines as a precedent for similarly abridging the trials of routine medications.

      As for liability issues, the issuance of FDA approval does not shield the manufacturer of a drug from liability for belatedly discovered adverse effects. Consider the case of Merck's once-blockbuster drug Vioxx. About five years after it was approved and marketed, a new study showed that it increased the risk of heart attacks. Merck ended up paying out $4.85 billion to settle a consumer class action lawsuit as a result of that (plus an additional later $830 million settlement to investors for failing to properly disclose the liability to them). Perhaps Merck would have prevailed had the case gone to trial, but the pharma companies rarely take that risk.

      1. Vog46

        Clyde
        I would LOVE to believe that
        But in todays litigation driven society I can see a pharma company arguing in court that "previous productions runs of limited tested vaccines were fast track approved with no significant dangers posed by those medicines on the general population - in fact those fast tracked vaccines proved extremely effective in preventing future spread of the virus therefore THIS medicine should also be fast tracked..........."

        In today's world a loophole soon becomes SOP.
        I hope you are right

  4. Frederic Mari

    One (adverse effect but, usually, death) is too many!

    People are morons. I suck at statistics and probabilities but never a field of maths was invented that is more useful to understand for non-scientists (beyond addition, subtraction and multiplication)

Comments are closed.