Skip to content

Self-driving cars are here! Sort of. Mercedes will sell a car in 2024 that can drive on highways with no hands on the steering wheel. But there's a catch:

The 'DRIVE PILOT' system can only operate on highways during daylight at speeds not exceeding 40 miles per hour, the DMV said. Mercedes-Benz said in a statement it will make the automated driving system available in the U.S. market as an option for its model year 2024 S-Class and EQS Sedan vehicles.

....The permit grants Mercedes-Benz permission to offer its 'DRIVE PILOT' system on California highways in the Bay Area, Central Valley, Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Diego and on interstate highway connecting Southern California to Nevada.

There's only one interstate highway that connects Southern California and Nevada: I15. So for some reason this car is approved for most state highways but only one federal highway.

And the maximum speed is 40 mph, which practically sounds illegal it's so slow. It's hard to imagine anyone using this tech if it's limited to 40 mph. Plus you have to keep your eyes on the road—enforced by a camera that watches your face. No napping!

That's a lot of snags. Still, the very fact of its existence means that true autonomous driving on highways is almost here. Another year or two and it should be a real thing.

As near as I can tell, there are three primary defenses of Donald Trump coming from Republicans:

  • Trump didn't sell any of the documents, destroy or alter any documents, or give them away. So how bad can it be?
  • Hillary did it too.
  • DOJ and the FBI are corrupt and have been weaponized against Trump.

None of these even remotely address the actual charges against Trump: that he took classified documents with him when he left the White House and then actively withheld them even after NARA and the FBI repeatedly demanded their return.

But they just don't care. They don't care about January 6. They don't care about the Big Lie. They don't care that Trump tried to extort Ukraine for dirt on Joe Biden. No matter what, Trump is being unfairly victimized. That's the alpha and omega. The facts don't matter and never will.

Are we in the middle of a great moral decline? It's a common belief. But it turns out it's always been a common belief.

Every year for the past 70 years, anyway. A new study tests the belief in moral decline by examining survey items conducted since 1949:

Typical items included: “Do you think that over the last few decades our society has become less honest and ethical in its behavior, more honest and ethical, or has there been no change in the extent to which people behave honestly and ethically?” and “Right now, do you think the state of moral values in this country as a whole is getting better or getting worse?

The researchers found that respondents typically agreed with an astonishing 84% of items like this. They believed in moral decline in 1949; they believed in moral decline in 2019; and they believed in moral decline every year in between. What's more, they consistently believed moral decline happened at very specific times, as shown in this somewhat odd looking chart:

People generally believe that morality was high and stable until the year they were born. Then it declines. Morality is perceived as declining a bit in the first 20 years of their life and then declining considerably up to the present day.

But is morality declining? The authors investigated this by looking at survey questions that ask about current morality:

For decades, survey researchers have also been asking people to report directly on the moral values, traits and behaviours of themselves and their contemporaries in the present: “Were you treated with respect all day yesterday?” or “Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful, or that they are mostly just looking out for themselves?”...If, as people all over the world claim, morality has been declining steadily and precipitously for decades, then people’s reports of current morality should also have declined over the years. Have they?

Unsurprisingly, the answer is clear: reports of current morality were stable over time. The authors looked at surveys from 1965 through 2020 and found no differences. Furthermore, they found that among personal friends and acquaintances, people reported slightly higher morality over time.

In short, most people believe that morality has declined over time but this is almost certainly not true. So why do they believe it? The authors offer an involved psychological theory, but I'd guess the answer is fairly simple. The belief in moral decline is strongest among conservatives and the elderly, and both groups simply disapprove of lots of modern changes. It's perfectly consistent, for example, to believe that individuals are as decent as ever but also to believe that gay marriage represents moral decay. The same is true for choices of clothing, women working outside the home, reduced churchgoing, and other trends that conservatives and the elderly tend to disapprove of.

In any case, the overall conclusion is clear: "the perception of moral decline is pervasive, perdurable, unfounded and easily produced." If anything, kindness, honesty, and basic human decency have likely increased in recent years. People just prefer not to believe it.

The indictment against Donald Trump in the classified documents case has been unsealed. It includes 37 separate counts:

The bulk of the charges in the 49-page indictment, unsealed Friday afternoon, relate to willful retention of national defense information — a violation of the Espionage Act that pertains to whether individuals broke the rules for the handling of classified documents. The charges also include conspiracy to obstruct justice, withholding a document or record, corruptly concealing a document or record, concealing a document in an investigation, scheming to conceal, and false statements. Trump aide Walt Nauta also was charged. Trump has denied any wrongdoing.

Here's more:

As Trump tried to avoid complying with a May 11, 2022, subpoena that required him to produce all documents with classification markings that were in his possession, Walt Nauta was the person he relied on to help conceal the boxes he wanted to keep, the indictment alleges.

....The 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information each carry a maximum prison term of 10 years. The one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice carries a maximum prison term of 20 years. Rarely are people sentenced to the maximum terms.

....When FBI agents searched Mar-a-Lago on Aug. 8, 2022, one of the most alarming documents they discovered in Donald Trump’s possession was “concerning nuclear capabilities of a foreign country,” the indictment says.

....Once he realized he was being investigated, former president Donald Trump “endeavored to obstruct the FBI and grand jury investigations and conceal his continued retention of classified documents,” the indictment unsealed Friday said. According to the indictment, Trump suggested that his lawyer mislead the FBI about what classified papers he still possessed and directed a loyal aide, Walt Nauta, to move boxes to conceal them from Trump’s own lawyer.

The indictment is here. More to come, I'm sure.

What exactly was Donald Trump talking about in his recorded conversation about secret documents and Mark Milley, his Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff? And what document was he waving around during this conversation? Here's the background.

In the middle of 2020 Milley nearly resigned because he believed Trump was "doing great and irreparable harm to my country" and had "made a concerted effort over time to politicize the United States military." In the end, though, Milley stayed on because he thought he was one of the few guardrails left against Trump’s "increasingly erratic and dangerous behavior." In The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021, Peter Baker and Susan Glassman tell the rest of the story:

[Shortly after the election], Milley was called to the White House to present various military options for attacking Iran....Trump kept asking for alternatives, including an attack inside Iran on its ballistic-weapons sites. Milley explained that this would be an illegal preëmptive act: “If you attack the mainland of Iran, you will be starting a war.”

....Trump often seemed more bluster than bite, and the Pentagon brass still believed that he did not want an all-out war, yet he continued pushing for a missile strike on Iran even after that November meeting. If Trump said it once, Milley told his staff, he said it a thousand times. “The thing he was most worried about was Iran,” a senior Biden adviser who spoke with Milley recalled. “Milley had had the experience more than once of having to walk the President off the ledge when it came to retaliating.”

This is most likely what Trump is talking about when he says this on tape about Milley:

He said that I wanted to attack Iran. Isn’t that amazing?....They presented me this — this is off the record, but — they presented me this. This was him. This was the Defense Department and him. We looked at some. This was him. This wasn’t done by me, this was him.

Robert Costa confirms that after he left office Trump became obsessed with Milley and frequently got careless:

In short, it comes down to one person: *Milley.* Trump loathed his coverage in press, in books, per multiple sources….Trump fumed in post-presidency period about Milley, in his view, being cast as a hero and himself as an insurrectionist.

....Trump’s anger about Milley led him to be cavalier about what he said about Milley and their interactions & policy decisions, and it frustrates some aides who notice how he would veer into dicey/near classified material in convos. Then Trump started to do interviews for books…

The indictment against Trump, which was unsealed earlier today, refers to all this:

The indictment says that Trump appeared to be proud of the material he retained and eager to show them off as keepsakes. “Isn’t it amazing?“ he asked a visitor to his golf club in Bedminster, N.J., after showing off Iran intelligence, boasting that military commanders “presented me this.’ Trump said he randomly plucked the papers off ‘a big pile,’ suggesting he had many more.

So this is what Trump was talking about. He summoned Milley to the White House to present options for attacking Iran, and then used that document to claim it was really Milley and the Pentagon all along who wanted to attack Iran. The document that outlined options is likely the one Trump was waving around when he launched into his rants about Milley.

Yesterday we had a bunch of city workers on the street outside our backyard, and they had lots of machines that made loud noises as they dug up the roadway. This is why Hilbert looks a little startled in this picture. He wanted to play in the backyard, but he wasn't really sure about all the snorting and clanking. In the end, he decided to come back indoors and just gaze out the open door, where he'd be safe from whatever all those people were doing.

By an odd chance, today brings yet more evidence that young people are becoming more conservative. A PRRI poll asked whether people believed there were only two gender identities (man and woman) and Gen Z respondents showed a huge increase over the past two years:

Every age group showed an increase, which is yet another data point suggesting that Americans in general are getting more conservative. And while Gen Z is still more liberal on this question than other age groups, it showed by far the biggest conservative movement. What's going on?

Startup companies in the US raised only $37 billion in venture capital during the first quarter of 2023. That's less than half what they raised during the tech boom a year ago:

Part of the reason for the slowdown is simply that booms don't last forever. Another part is that lots of current startups are just dumb. “Most of the companies we are handling now frankly deserved to have gone out of business a year or two ago,” said Barry Kallander, president of KallanderGroup, which provides corporate restructuring and dissolution services.

Maybe so. But they're going out of business now.

CNN has a transcript of a 2021 conversation in which Donald Trump is complaining that Gen. Mark Milley said Trump wanted to attack Iran. Then he waved around a document that apparently says the opposite:

This totally wins my case, you know. Except it is like, highly confidential. Secret. This is secret information....As president, I could have declassified, but now I can’t.

This acknowledgment that (a) the document is classified and (b) he can no longer declassify it undercuts Trump's longtime claim that he declassified all the documents found at Mar-a-Lago. Since this was likely going to be part of his defense in the documents case, it's critical evidence for the prosecution. Whatever else Trump has to say, this demonstrates that the documents he refused to turn over were classified and he knew it.

On Monday Ron DeSantis released a campaign video that included images of Donald Trump hugging and kissing Dr. Anthony Fauci:

Three of the images in this collage are real. The three that show Trump hugging Fauci are AI fakes.

DeSantis's excuse? He refuses to comment. However:

A person with the DeSantis campaign told CNN that the video was a social media post, not a paid advertisement, and pointed out that members of Trump’s team had also used fake or doctored images in the past.

That's about as lame as it gets. DeSantis was supposed to be the "competent Trump," but so far he's only shown that he's the Trump's Trump. This kind of fake attack imagery is every bit as bad as the stuff that Trump himself engages in.