Sam Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison today for his role in the collapse of crypto broker FTX. Here's what John Ray, the guy hired to clean up the mess after FTX declared bankruptcy, had to say about him a few days ago:
Vast sums of money were stolen by Mr. Bankman-Fried, and he was rightly convicted by a jury of his peers. That things that he stole, things he converted into other things, whether they were investments in Bahamas real estate, cryptocurrencies or speculative ventures, were successfully recovered through the enormous efforts of a dedicated group of professionals (a group unfairly maligned by Mr. Bankman-Fried and his supporters) does not mean that things were not stolen. What it means is that we got some of them back. And there are plenty of things we did not get back, like the bribes to Chinese officials or the hundreds of millions of dollars he spent to buy access to or time with celebrities or politicians or investments for which he grossly overpaid having done zero diligence. The harm was vast. The remorse is nonexistent.
I agree wholeheartedly. And yet, I think the 25-year sentence was too harsh. Why? Because I think pretty much every prison sentence handed out in the US is too harsh. If we cut every sentence served by every prisoner in half, we'd probably still be a little too harsh. But it would be a start.
That said, if there's an exception to be made, it would be for someone like Bankman-Fried. Generally speaking, long sentences ruin lives for little reason, since they don't do much to deter crime and most people don't commit violent crimes after their 30s anyway.
But a white collar criminal like Bankman-Fried? There's no aging out of crime for a guy like him. When he gets out there's a good chance that he'll get involved in some scam or another very quickly. It's what he's good at, after all.