More about Clarence Thomas and his seemingly endless stream of gifts from Harlan Crow:
“This is way outside the norm. This is way in excess of anything I’ve seen,” said Richard Painter, former chief White House ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush, referring to the cascade of gifts over the years.
The ethics lawyer for George W. Bush thinks this is bad. But wait!
Justices also must report many gifts to their spouses and dependent children. The law’s definition of dependent child is narrow, however, and likely would not apply to Martin since Thomas was his legal guardian, not his parent. The best case for not disclosing Crow’s tuition payments would be to argue the gifts were to Martin, not Thomas, experts said.
Thomas was just his legal guardian, so it's all good.
This is obviously ridiculous. The money was plainly a gift to Thomas, since he's the one who normally would have paid the tuition fees. And it's not like he couldn't afford it:
Thomas has long been one of the less wealthy members of the Supreme Court. Still, when Martin was in high school, he and Ginni Thomas had income that put them comfortably in the top echelon of Americans.
In 2006 for example, the Thomases brought in more than $500,000 in income. The following year, they made more than $850,000 from Clarence Thomas’ salary from the court, Ginni Thomas’ pay from the Heritage Foundation and book payments for the justice’s memoir.
This really should be the last straw. Believe it or not, I've been a little bit on the fence until now about this whole affair, but not any longer. Even if it was all legal, Thomas should have reported it. The fact that he didn't means nothing good.
But Thomas doesn't give a shit. Only impeachment can force him out of office, and that's not going to happen. He could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and he'd still be secure in his job.