Skip to content

I posted a GAO chart yesterday showing that Millennials had pretty good retirement prospects compared to Boomers, and then mentioned in passing that this "gibes with projections from the Social Security Administration." However, that was based on my memory of an old Social Security report, and I had just warned everyone not to assume that things stayed the same forever. So I looked up the latest report to get their most recent projection:

This projection comes from MINT8, the current version of Social Security's MINT simulation tool. It was published in 2018 and relies partly on economic projections from the 2018 Social Security Trustees report.

MINT is considered one of the best retirement projections available because it tries to account for all types of retirement income, including Social Security, current earnings from work, pensions (including 401(k) accounts), financial assets, and a few other things. It also has no special ax to grind and merely tries to project income as accurately as possible.

Aside from the basic numbers, there are several things to consider here. First, and most important, Millennials have perfectly good retirement prospects in terms of raw dollars: about $65,000 compared to $52,000 for Boomers.¹ On the other hand, this represents only 75% of average worker income for Millennials compared to 94% of average worker income for Boomers.

As you'd expect, retirement prospects vary greatly for different demographic groups. You can read the report for details. Also, it's worth noting that the reduction in retirement income as a percentage of worker income is largely due to the steady drop in old-style pensions. However, those have long since disappeared for nearly everyone except government workers, which means that retirement as a percentage of current worker income also flattened out long ago. The projection for every birth cohort since 1980 is that their total retirement income will be about 75% of current average worker income.

¹Yes, this is adjusted for projected inflation. It's genuinely more income than current retirees have on average.

This is Eve Despairing by Auguste Rodin. In the background is the dome of Les Invalides, the complex built by Louis XIV for soldiers who were wounded and disabled in his interminable wars.

Adjusted for population, Louis's wars accounted for about half as many fatalities in Western Europe as in all of World War II. However, he didn't like to be reminded of this by the soldiers who made it back. The dome of Invalides sits on top of a private chapel that Louis could use to attend Mass without having to mingle with the disabled veterans.

May 31, 2022 — Paris, France

Every year I like to take a look at the Washington Post's Fatal Force database to see if we're continuing to make progress on police shootings of unarmed suspects. We are:

This is adjusted for population shares. Black suspects are still killed at the highest rate, but only slightly. Hispanics are killed at the lowest rate.

The raw numbers really drive this home:

In 2022, only seven unarmed Black suspects were shot and killed by police. That's less than a fifth of the number killed in 2015.

This is also a good example of how racial justice can benefit everybody. The campaign to reduce police shootings came primarily from the Black community, but it benefited both white and Hispanic communities as well. Shootings of unarmed white suspects have gone down from 95 to 26 while shootings of unarmed Hispanic suspects have gone down from 21 to 2.

Fox News should be proud:

Apparently their ceaseless campaign against violent crime finally paid off and crime dropped by more than half. The pen really is mightier than the sword!

Believe it or not, I came home from Virginia with a homework assignment. The assignment was to answer this question: Is it really true that the share of wealth owned by Millennials is much lower than the share of wealth owned by Baby Boomers at the same age?

The simple answer is: Yes. The better answer is: Where did this meme come from in the first place? Who cares about population shares, anyway? Wouldn't it make more sense to look at per-capita wealth instead?

Yes it would. In fact, it's so obvious that I truly do wonder where this share-of-wealth meme started. But let's put that aside and move on.


Unsurprisingly, what follows is a bunch of charts. But don't get impatient with them! I'll eventually get to student loan debt, housing costs, and other Millennial issues.

First off, here is wealth per capita for both Boomers and Millennials:

This comes courtesy of Jeremy Horpedahl, who pulled his data from the Federal Reserve’s Distributional Financial Accounts. This is more or less where everyone gets their data on wealth, and for now I'm going to assume that the Fed's data is reasonable and that Prof. Horpedahl has done his sums correctly.

Here's another chart courtesy of the Fed:

The raw data for this chart comes from the Fed's Survey of Consumer Finances. The authors modeled expected wealth from the five most recent editions of the SCF and then compared it to actual wealth by generation.

As you can see, in 2007 Millennials were 43% below where they should have been. This continued through 2016, but in 2019 suddenly Millennials caught up. They are now only 11% below expectations and seem likely to make that up fairly soon.

There are two lessons to learn here. First, you have to keep up with the data. Things that we believe because we've seen them over and over don't necessarily stay true forever. Second, when you're dealing with small numbers, small changes can be a big deal.

For example, one of the reasons for the big jump in 2019 is probably student loans. When Millennials were in their 20s, they had lots of students loans and small incomes. Those loans had a huge impact on their ability to accumulate wealth. Today, many of those loans are paid off and Millennial incomes are higher. Put together, a big jump in wealth accumulation is what you'd expect.

Now let's take a look at some other stuff. First up is plain old income:

Incomes haven't gone up much over the past few decades, but it's nonetheless the case that Millennials make more money than Boomers did at the same age.

Here's a GAO look at retirement assets:

Millennials are doing well, and this data gibes with projections from the Social Security Administration:

Here is housing:

Up until this year, actual mortgage payments had been dropping. The middle Boomer had a monthly payment of about $1,900 at age 30 compared to the middle Millennial with a payment of $1,500. However, homeownership is still down among Millennials:

Homeownership dropped for a decade and then recovered, but today's Millennials still have a homeownership rate that's less than the rate of Boomers in the mid-80s. The difference is slight, but it shows that the Great Recession really did take a toll.

The big lesson I take away from all this is that student loans have probably been skewing these numbers for the past decade. Millennials really have borne the brunt of the student loan explosion, which means that college-educated Millennials have been forced to lead a more austere life in their twenties than Boomers did. However, the amount of wealth accumulation for any generation during their twenties has always been trivial, so once their loans are paid off Millennials catch up pretty quickly in the wealth department.

In any case, older Millennials (age 30+) are finally entering a phase of life where their loans are paid off and their jobs are paying well. As more and more Millennials exit student loan hell, the true state of their financial status becomes a lot easier to see. Roughly speaking, they're better off than Boomers in almost every respect.

POSTSCRIPT: All the usual caveats apply here. These are all averages, and lots of people are above or below them. Housing costs more in big cities. And most of the results I've presented here are for older Millennials. Younger Millennials are still affected by student loan debt and will not begin accumulating significant wealth for another 5-10 years.

This is Great Falls Park in Virginia. The Potomac is impassable at this point unless (a) you have a kayak or (b) you build a canal to get around it, as George Washington did. Today, the canal is gone but the kayakers remain.

The top photo shows Great Falls in lovely, velvety splendor thanks to a 10-second exposure time. The bottom photo is for those of you who prefer a mundane representation of reality.

November 9, 2022 — Great Falls Park, Virginia

It's still 43 days until the new Congress starts up, but it's never too early to take a deep dive into some the important issues Republicans will be addressing when January 3rd rolls around. And anyway, there's only one, so it's not like you have a ton of homework to do. The subject, of course, is Hunter Biden and his laptop. Here's a detailed rundown of this sordid affair:

  • Back in the day, Hunter did a lot of drugs and got himself enmeshed in a bunch of sleazy deals. Apparently he routinely promised people that his ties to "Dad" would be a big help to their cause.
  • There is no evidence that Joe Biden knew about Hunter's dealings or was ever involved in any of them.

Also, come on. Even if you're a total partisan hack, this doesn't really sound like Joe's style, does it?

I guess that wasn't so hard after all. Just try to keep these bullet points in mind during the 672 days of Fox News hits; strategic leaking to friendly reporters; invocations of "there's no other explanation for ______" (there always is); New York Times excerpts from the inevitable Peter Schweizer book; 3,000-word thumbsuckers on the Ukrainian judicial system circa 2017; and, of course, chants of "Lock him up" because MAGAnauts are nothing if not predictable.

Like many people, I have long feared that Chinese authorities would eventually find it impossible to keep up their drastic COVID lockdown policies. Well, it's starting:

And here's the result:

COVID in China has a doubling time of about five days and an R0 of 1.4, which is fairly low. But it would be no surprise if that increases with both time and better information.

Maybe this is just a brief spasm of protest that will be quickly put down. But if it's not, China is about to become the biggest reservoir of COVID virus in the world, and probably the biggest source of variants in the world too.

Paul Campos recently went to Wikipedia to look up the highest grossing concert tours of all time. Long story short, the #1 spot is held by Ed Sheeran, which Paul found dismaying because he had never heard of Ed Sheeran.

This is life for us oldsters. Sorry. But really, it's mostly related to interest in music. Marian likes to watch music award shows, which means I watch them too now and again—and I routinely ask some version of "Wait, is that really somebody famous?" It is, of course, and Marian knows all about them even though she's two years older than me.

Having said that, though, come on, man. Ed Sheeran? Even I know that he's one of the most famous singers in the world. Jeez.

And one other thing. My first thought when I read Paul's post was, "Sure, but maybe Sheeran just went on tour for a really long time." If you stay on the road forever, of course your total gross will be really high.

Sure enough, Sheeran did 255 shows over three years. But if you look at highest gross per show, the Rolling Stones are on top and Sheeran is only tenth. Sorry, Ed.

POSTSCRIPT: This comes via Atrios, who I basically agree with.

At this moment, the LA Times, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and the Guardian are all giving front-page play to the fact that Elon Musk has decided to reinstate Donald Trump's Twitter account.

Why? Have we learned nothing in the past few years about the difference between news and mindless clickbait?