Month: December 2023

Do I have any readers under 30? This chart made the rounds today and I'm confused:

I don't know how accurate this is, but I've seen plenty of charts like it. Here's what I don't get.

It makes sense that online introductions have gone up. But that much? People still go to college, they go to work, and they go to bars. They still have family, friends, and neighbors. But those modes of introduction have dropped to almost nothing. Why?

Is it because online dating is so hugely superior that no one is willing to risk any other method now? Have we gotten so woke that no one dares make an in-person advance these days? Are you just more likely to hit it off with someone you meet online compared to meeting IRL? Thoughts?

For the record, I wish the authors would distinguish between meeting someone at an online dating site and meeting someone during some other kind of online activity. These are very different things to casually lump together.

Here's my sorta-monthly look at how Joe Biden is polling compared to our last two presidents:

Biden has dipped recently and is no longer equal to Obama and Trump at this point in their presidencies. But the differences are still at the noise level. We have not yet seen the whites of their eyes.

Here's a look at recent gasoline prices:

There's really nothing to see. When we started driving less at the start of the pandemic, that reduced demand for gasoline and prices went down. At the start of the Ukraine war supplies of gasoline cratered and prices went up. Aside from that, gasoline has been pretty steadily selling for around $3-3.50 a gallon for the past five years.

Supply and demand: Not just a good idea. It's the law.

This is a lovely day on Paris's Left Bank taken from the Pont Saint-Michel. The Île de la Cité is on the right.

What the actual fuck?

Tainted cinnamon applesauce pouches that have sickened scores of children in the U.S. may have been purposefully contaminated with lead, according to FDA’s Deputy Commissioner for Human Foods Jim Jones.

....The agency and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have collaborated with state and local health authorities as well as Ecuadorian authorities to trace the origin of the cinnamon in the applesauce pouches, which is believed to be the source of the lead contamination.

The FDA believes this wasn't just a matter of poor hygiene at the factory. The lead was deliberately added to the cinnamon. They say it was "economically motivated," a way of making the cinnamon cheaper.

This is remarkable. A pouch of applesauce contains something like one gram of cinnamon, which costs less than a quarter of a cent on the global market. But it's cheaper to use less cinnamon and make up the weight with lead?

What's even worse is that the FDA suspects this is a routine practice—but only for cinnamon shipped to poor countries. It was only caught this time because the cinnamon supplier screwed up and accidentally delivered a tainted batch for applesauce that was destined for the US, where we have the ability to detect lead contamination. Everyone else is out of luck.

The only thing left now is to figure out if the applesauce manufacturer is shocked by this or "shocked" by it. After all, how would the cinnamon supplier know which batch was going where unless they had the connivance of the applesauce maker?

The Wall Street Journal says that the world's central bankers have won their long, brutal battle against inflation:

You know, if central banks are declaring victory for getting inflation down, then they must have done something wrong to make inflation go up in the first place. Maybe they should hold off on the hosannas.

Alternatively, they had nothing to do with inflation going up and nothing to do with inflation going down. It was all supply chain pressure and stimulus spending from legislatures. Central banks could have just snoozed through the whole thing with not much harm done.

The BEA released price levels by state today for 2022. Here's how your state stacks up:

This includes housing costs, so it's no surprise that DC and California top the list. Conversely, your dollar goes the furthest in Arkansas and Mississippi. Keep this in mind when you're deciding where to retire.

Note that virtually all the cheap states are Republican and virtually all the expensive ones are Democratic. There are nonpartisan reasons for some of this (rural vs. urban, coastal vs. inland), but it still tells you something about the state of American politics. When Republicans say the economy isn't very good, at least part of this is because it isn't very good in their states.

Here's an interesting chart from Brian Schaffner. It's a little hard to parse, so take a look and I'll explain it below:

Take a look at the left panel, for Democrats. Then, at the bottom, move over to the right to the line for people whose incomes increased $40K or more. It shows that about 10% of these people said their income had gone down (magenta line) while 50% said it had gone up (green line). It's surprising that so many people could be off when their actual incomes had increased so much, but at least it's directionally right. Way more people know their incomes went up than think it went down.

Now look at the same spot on the right panel, for Republicans. Even among people whose income had increased $40K, only about 22% said it had gone up compared to 27% who said it went down.

This is crazytown. $40,000 is a lot of money. How is it that among Republicans who had gained that much income, more said their incomes were down than up?

For what it's worth, the accuracy of self-reported income was no great shakes for anyone. Democrats who had lost income were more optimistic than they should have been. Still, this is yet another indication of just how resistant Republicans are to economic good news in the Biden era. Even when things are going great, they just can't bring themselves to believe it. Is it any wonder that when you average everyone together opinions about the economy seem so sour?

A couple of days ago I asked, "Where are all the tunnels?" A reader points me to a recent Wall Street Journal article that includes this map:

This makes things even more mysterious. The Journal's map is several years old, but it comes from the Israeli military and presumably they have more current ones. But if this map is actually accurate, it suggests that Israel has no need to hunt for tunnels or to destroy vast swaths of Gaza looking for them. The IDF already knows exactly where they are.

This jibes with the news that the IDF is getting ready to flood the tunnels. You can hardly do that unless you know where they are.

So this redoubles my question: If Israel already knows where most of the tunnels are, why are they razing entire city blocks hunting for them? And where are the huge caches of guns and bombs and food and fuel? Do they really know where the tunnels are but are unwilling to actually go into them?

Mysteriouser and mysteriouser.

Americans are still spending:

Retail and food spending was up slightly from last month, but it's just noise. Spending hasn't dropped, but it's been basically flat for the past three years.