Skip to content

For the past week I've had a houseguest, an old friend who inherited a big pile of old tickets to Disneyland a few years ago. So on Thursday that's where we went.

This was a mistake. The day before I walked around for an hour and felt fine. I took this to mean that plain old walking was OK and wouldn't tire me out. What it actually meant was that walking for an hour was OK and wouldn't tire me out. As it turned out, after two hours at the park I was dragging badly and after three hours I was about ready to collapse. This was thanks to the combination of my stupid cancer med and a cold I was getting over.

So we weren't there for long and I didn't get to take many pictures. But here's one of the ones I did. It's a long exposure shot of the teacups. As you can see, everyone is whirling around merrily except for the the lazy guy in the orange cup who's just sitting there looking bored.

NB: For those who've never been to Disneyland, there's a wheel in the center of each cup. The harder you turn the wheel, the more the cup spins. If you do nothing, it just sits there.

October 24, 2024 — Anaheim, California

Taylor Telford has a piece in the Washington Post today about office workers no longer knowing how to act at work:

More than two years after employers began urging white-collar workers back to offices, Americans are still reckoning with the ripple effects of pandemic-induced disruption when it comes to workplace behavior. The years spent apart from colleagues have rusted workers’ social skills, and new ways of working have spawned a host of fresh etiquette issues.

I initially met this with my usual skepticism. Am I really supposed to believe that basic social skills atrophied in a mere year or two? I haven't gone into an office for more than 20 years, but I'm pretty sure my social skills are about the same as always (for better or worse).

But I kept reading and got interested despite myself. For example:

Workers who had substantial professional experience before the pandemic, including managers and executives, still need help adapting to hybrid and remote work, Senning said. He has been coaching leaders on best practices for such things as communicating through your calendar and deciding whether to call, text or use Slack to reach an employee.

Establishing etiquette for video meetings has also been a challenge for many firms.... “If I had a magic button that I could push that could get people to treat video meetings with 50 percent of the same level of professionalism they treat an in-person meeting, I would make a lot of HR, personnel managers, and executives very, very happy,” Senning said.

Huh. I guess I have to admit that I might be a little rusty on the fine points of not committing a faux pas by calling instead of Slacking—or presumably worse yet, emailing. And while Zoom etiquette seems fairly obvious to me—join on time, pay attention, don't jerk off while your camera is on—maybe there are details I'm not aware of. There's also this:

Richey, for instance, has noticed younger workers struggling with both verbal and nonverbal forms of communication, whether through eye contact, greetings or basic conversation. “This younger generation has been used to such an informal communication style with texting and social media,” Richey said. “It definitely has had an impact.”

Kelly Rownd, director for career readiness at North Carolina State University, said that young professionals today generally get more opportunities for skill-building than previous generations. But they’re not always experienced when it comes to the social elements: drafting emails, networking, knowing how to behave in a meeting vs. at a client dinner. Meanwhile, companies increasingly rely on colleges and universities to provide this instruction, she added.

Eye contact? We're talking about kids who have been through four years of high school and four years of college, mostly in-person. That's a lot of ordinary social interaction even if you text a lot. What the hell?

Now, as near as I can tell, business executives have been complaining forever that new hires straight out of college lack real-world skills. Which, almost by definition, they do. So maybe this is just the usual kvetching about thekidsthesedays.

Or not. I suppose I'll never know for sure.

Haul out pretty much any front page and the political news is nearly identical every day now:

  • Donald Trump said something repellent again.
  • Voters are still mad about inflation.
  • The race is a toss-up.

There's nothing new, no October surprise, and virtually no change in the polls.

Is Kamala Harris doing something wrong? I don't really know her strategy in the first place, so I don't know. But I still think she's going to win. Like everyone, I have Reasons™, but in the end I guess I'm just hanging desperately onto my hope that the American public isn't irredeemably foul and lost. Fingers crossed.

Naturally Donald Trump himself gets the final MSG post. But it's not for any single thing he said, since he just repeated all his greatest hits from the past. Instead, it's for his full body of work.

Elon gets a whole post to himself. Not because he said something racist, but because he said something so massively dumb.

Elon used to be smart enough to do simple addition, but he thinks we can cut "at least" $2 trillion from federal spending—which amounted to $6.7 trillion in FY2024, not $6.5 trillion.

The arithmetic here is simple. If you add up Social Security + Medicare¹ + defense² + veterans pensions + interest on the debt³ you get $4.4 trillion. There's only $2.3 trillion left.

So Elon is claiming we should literally zero out the entire rest of the federal budget. Everything. The FBI, national parks, food stamps, Medicaid, education, NASA, the EPA, farm support, the NIH, all federal R&D grants, embassies worldwide, the FAA, the Department of Justice, the VA, the weather service, the border patrol, etc. etc. Everything.

What is it that didn't just move Musk to the right, but turned him into into a screaming, drooling lunatic with the effective IQ of a squirrel? I won't say I've never seen anything like it, but I've never seen it quite so unhinged from a basically sane and brilliant starting point.

¹Trump has promised not to cut either one.

²Trump has promised to increase defense spending.

³Both are legally obligated.

UPDATE: I originally wrote this post using 2023 spending numbers. I've updated it to 2024. Nothing changed about the conclusion, though.

Apologies for dropping the ball on this. I had to make an urgent IT house call on my mother, so I spent the afternoon in Garden Grove. But it's not too late to catch up now with Donald Trump's racism fest at Madison Square Garden.

How is Donald Trump's big rally at Madison Square Garden going? Looks like it's gonna be a barn burner. Here's an early update:

I did not know this:

Since people seem to have missed this one, unsealed in the Smith filing:

-Trump used a burner phone, routed through a foreign country to contact Michigan house speaker.

-He tried to pressure the speaker in this off book call.

-Speaker McCarthy knew about the burner phone line.

-The phone showed up as “Spam Risk Egypt” on caller ID.

If the President thought his attempt to overturn the election and forge elector documents were legitimate “official acts” why was he using an insecure, foreign routed burner phone for these calls?

Receipts—i.e., testimony from Michigan's house speaker—are here.

Israel announced today that it is carrying out strikes against Iran in response to an Iranian attack last month in response to Israel's murder of Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah in response to Hezbollah border attacks in response to Israel's war in Gaza in response to the Hamas attacks on October 7 in response to Israel's increasingly brutal occupation of the West Bank in response to rising terrorism from Palestinians in response to Israel's wall in response to the Second Intifada in response to the failure of the Camp David talks in response to Yasser Arafat's rejection of a deal in response to Israel's refusal to cede control of East Jerusalem in response to fears of Palestinian revival during the First Intifada in response to Israel's "Iron Fist" policy of oppression in response to raids from southern Lebanon in response to the Lebanon War in response to an attempt to assassinate Israel's ambassador to Britain in response to the Yom Kippur War in response to Israel's occupation of the West Bank in response to the Six-Day War in response to Egypt's closure of the Strait of Tiran in response to Israel's attack on as-Samu in response to PLO terrorism in response to Israeli existence in response to the 1948 War in response to the UN creation of Israel in response to de facto Israeli settlement in Palestine in response to the Balfour Declaration in response to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the Zionist movement.

More or less, anyway.